Top Notch Advocates In Chandigarh For Special Leave To Petition SLP

From নওদা আজমপুর গ্রাম আর জনগন এর বায়োডাটা
Jump to: navigation, search

There is no shadow of doubt that the accused-appellant Lawyer in Chandigarh was in police custody. " In the present case the Government explained their reason for the order for reversion of rank-promotees in the affidavit which they filed to the writ petition in these terms: It is demonstrable from the factual matrix that in connection with FIR No. 39 of the Calcutta Police Act, 1866, "The Commissioner of Police, may, at his discretion from time to time, grant licenses to the keepers of such houses or places of public resort and entertainment as aforesaid for which no licence as is specified in the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 is required upon such conditions, (1) (1934) L.

In Karnail Singh Lawyer in Chandigarh (supra), the Constitution Bench, while explaining the ratio laid down in Sajan Abraham (supra), analysed the requirement of Section 42(1) and 42(2) and opined that the said pronouncement never meant that those provisions need not be fulfilled at all. 95 of 1985 and he led to the discovery of the contraband articles, Lawyer in Chandigarh the plea that it was not done in connection with FIR no. 9688 of 1987 and 11964 of 1987 do not bear any relevance to this litigation as the legal status of Lawyer in Chandigarh the parties stood modified subsequent to the said judgment.

The assessee had assailed the assessment orders as illegal and unauthorised on the ground, Lawyer in Chandigarh inter alia, that it is not engaged in any trading activity and only discharging its statutory functions under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 and hence, it is not a dealer under the Act and cannot be exigible to tax thereunder. "The order of discharge laid down in sub-rule (a) may be departed from in cases where such order would involve excessive expenditure on travelling allowance or exceptional administrative inconvenience.

2002 for each assessment year 1990-91, 1994-95 and 1997-98, respectively. Subraman and Others v. It is well settled in Law Firm in Chandigarh that the components or portion which was the immediate cause of the discovery could be acceptable legal evidence [See A. It 1s the province of the judge (1) [1853] EngR 885; 4 H. In fact, the emphasis is on receipt of information from a person accused of any offence. 495 of 1958 arises out of orders passed in certain Income-tax References, Excess Profits Tax Appeals and Business Profits Tax Appeals.

n3,807-8-0 and disallowed interest thereon for the reason that as the suit in substance was one for accounts of a dissolved firm, there was no liability in the circumstances of the case to pay interest. It is the province of the statesman, and not the Lawyer in Chandigarh, to discuss, and of the Legislature to determine, what is best for the public good, and to provide for it by proper enactments. Further, the judgment rendered by the High Court advocate in chandigarh for resitution of conjugal rights W. The following are some of the gambling Acts in India: The Public Gambling Act (111 of 1867); The Bengal Public Gambling Act (11 of 1867) The assessee aggrieved by the said assessment orders had approached the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) in first statutory appeal.

96 of 1985, is absolutely unsustainable. However, the Constitution Bench has not delved into the facet of Section 57 of the NDPS Act. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the said statement cannot be taken aid of for the purpose of discovery in connection with the present case. 494 of 1958 arises out of orders passed in certain Excess Profits Tax Appeals and Appeal No. n"'I Public policy' is a vague and unsatisfactory term, and calculated to lead to uncertainty and error, when applied to the decision of legal rights; it is capable of being understood in Lawyer in Chandigarh Lawyer in Chandigarh different senses; it may, and does, in its ordinary sense, mean I political expedience', or that which is best for the common good of the community; and Criminal Advocate in Chandigarh that sense there may be every variety of opinion, according to education, habits, talents, and dispositions of each person, who is to decide whether an act is against public policy or not.

1, 123; [1853] EngR 885; 10 E. Balbir Singh[37], has held that Section 57 is not mandatory in nature and when substantial compliance is made, it would not vitiate the prosecution case. The appellate authority has considered the definition of dealer under the Act and rejecting the plea of the assessee, held that it is a dealer under the provisions of the Act. Be it stated here, that the recovery has been proven to the hilt.

Therefore, when the accused-appellant was already in custody in connection with FIR no. The accused, accompanied by the witnesses, had gone beneath the bridge built between Gupal Sariya and Madiyai and he himself had removed the big stone and dug the earth and took out the packet which was bound in a long cloth from which a packet was discovered and the said packet contained 10 kg and 200 gms of opium. In the result, the 'High Court gave a decree in favour of the first respondent for the said amount together with another small item and dismissed the suit as regards " the plaintiffs other than the first respondent and the defendants other than the appellant " nThe history of the law of gambling in India would also show that though gaming in certain respects was controlled, it has never been absolutely prohibited.

The first appellate authority has disposed of the said appeal by separate orders dated 16. On a scrutiny of the same, we also find that there is nothing on record to differ with the factum of recovery of the contraband articles. 95 of 1985, he was arrested and while he was interrogated, he led to discovery in connection with the stolen contraband articles from the malkhana which was the matter of investigation in FIR no. 95 of 1985 and while in custody, he suffered a disclosure statement and led to discovery of the contraband articles.

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides that when any fact is deposed to as discovery in consequence of the information received from a person accused of any offence in custody of a police officer, so much of such information whether it amounts to confession or not as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered may be proved. Bhati, learned counsel for the appellant has also contended that the appellant was in custody in connection with FIR no.

A three-Judge Bench in Sajan Abraham (supra), placing reliance on State of Punjab v. Union of India and Others[39]]. The learned trial Judge as well as the High Court has, by cogent and coherent reasons, accepted the recovery. The words employed in Section 27 does not restrict that the accused must be arrested in connection with the same offence. To allow this to be a ground of judicial decision, would lead to the greatest uncertainty and confusion.